200 Amsterdam clears hurdle


Make text smaller Make text larger


DOB lifts hold on proposed 668-foot tower; opponents vow to continue fight


Photos



  • The Department of Buildings lifted a hold on a proposed 668-foot residential building at the former site of Lincoln Square Synagogue on Amsterdam Avenue near 69th Street. Photo: Daniel Fitzsimmons



A controversial 668-foot residential tower is one step closer to rising over the Upper West Side following the Department of Buildings’ decision last week to lift a hold it had previously placed on the proposed project.

The proposed 55-story building at 200 Amsterdam Avenue has faced consistent opposition from a number of neighbors, community groups and elected officials, who claim that the design of the tower, which would be the tallest on the Upper West Side, does not align with the scale or context of the surrounding neighborhood.

The Department of Buildings placed a hold on the project in June, following a zoning challenge filed by the Committee for Environmentally Sound Development that cited various technical issues in the proposal, including that the open space used to justify the building’s exceptional height does not meet zoning requirements. The department lifted the hold September 26, paving the way for the project to move forward.

The proposed building’s height is based, in significant measure, on the large, irregularly shaped zoning lot on which it would sit, which opponents of the development have likened to a gerrymandered political district. Though the tower itself would occupy the former site of Lincoln Square Synagogue, near Amsterdam Avenue and 69th Street, its zoning lot — the size of which helps determine a building’s maximum size — is significantly larger than the proposed building’s footprint. Snaking in untidy fashion across much of the block, portions of the sprawling 110,000-square-foot zoning lot front 70th Street, West End Avenue and West End Avenue.

In July, the Department of Buildings issued a notice of objections and an intent to revoke “to verify the open space ratio and that the zoning lot was properly formed.” After the hold was lifted last week, a Department of Buildings spokesperson said that the developer had supplied the necessary additional information and zoning calculations to support the approval and resolve the Department of Buildings’ objections. The spokesperson noted that no changes to the structural plans for the building were required to resolve the objections. After the hold was lifted, the applicant refiled the permit application for the project and the Department of Buildings issued a new building permit.

Details regarding the applicant’s responses to the Department of Buildings’ objections had not been posted to the department’s website as of press time.

Council Member Helen Rosenthal, whose district includes the site of the proposed tower, has criticized the project and joined in support of the Committee for Environmentally Sound Development’s zoning challenge. Rosenthal issued a statement objecting to the Department of Buildings’ decision to lift the halt on the project, stating that the questions raised in the challenge “simply have not been answered to my satisfaction.”

“When this proposal was filed, it failed to include even the necessary facts and figures pertaining to its compliance with Open Space requirements,” Rosenthal said in the statement. “This was highlighted in the Committee’s challenge and led to the audit and the issuance of the Notice of Intent to Revoke. That information has apparently finally been provided. But the substantive concerns about the proposal’s bizarre, gerrymandered zoning have not been addressed.”

Olive Freud, the president of the Committee for Environmentally Sound Development, said that the committee plans to file an appeal with the Department of Buildings and, if necessary, with the Board of Standards and Appeals.

George M. Janes, a planning consultant who filed the zoning challenge on the group’s behalf, said that the appeals process could take months to play out. “That’s precious time lost,” Janes said. “There’s no stop work order, so the applicants can continue building the building.”

Freud said that Committee for Environmentally Sound Development would seek administrative relief through all available avenues. “If this 600-footer goes up, it sets precedence going all the way north on Broadway and Amsterdam and Columbus,” Freud said. “It’s horrible. Everyone on the West Side needs to be concerned about this.”


Make text smaller Make text larger

Comments



MUST READ NEWS

Image Bird perches in Central Park!
But this sighting, of a Hammond's Flycatcher in the Ramble, is an ornithological near-miracle
Image ‘Something to sing about’
Courting couples, schmoozing seniors and scampering children have used James Cagney Place on the East Side as an informal community hub for decades. Now its status is being...
Image What next for Garodnick?
In an exit interview, the outgoing East Side Council member reflects on three terms in office, ponders a political future, recounts his accomplishments — and heads for the...
Image The slowest buses in town
City’s most sluggish routes include M42, M31 and M57, report says
Image Cash cow for Council members
The heated race for City Council speaker has become a fundraising bonanza for elected officials and candidates as aspirants for the city’s second most powerful post shower...

VIDEOS



* indicates required
Neighborhood Newsletters





MOST READ

Local News
What next for Garodnick?
  • Dec 12, 2017
Local News
‘Something to sing about’
  • Dec 12, 2017
Local News
Women of faith
  • Dec 14, 2017
Local News
Eight nights of financial gifting
  • Dec 14, 2017
Local News
Bird perches in Central Park!
  • Dec 12, 2017

MOST COMMENTED