Sketch of a Starchitect
Sketches of Frank Gehry
Directed by Sydney Pollack
Pollack's narrative is modest: Interviews with Gehry are intercut with opinions on his buildings by critics, artists and assorted admirers. But the buildings themselves-especially the Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao, Spain-are never shown in a way that displays their grandeur. Pollack tells us to admire Gehry's originality and craft but the structures, as presented, are emphatically not moving. It's worse than the moment in Truth or Dare when live concert footage exposes the fact that Madonna cannot sing.
Sketches disappoints because Pollack doesn't know how to make images sing. Although he has artist Ed Ruscha (part of the Los Angeles art clique) testify that Gehry "mixes the freewheeling of art with the unforgiving laws of physics," and Julian Schnabel preens in his white bathroom, holding a snifter of cognac while comparing Gehry's audacity to that of Apocalypse Now, the film is full of static, poorly cropped images of Gehry's buildings. Not cinematically impressive.
Lacking scale and depth and wonder, none of these images match the faux-architecture of Fritz Lang's Metropolis or that mix of awe and regret that Nathaniel Kahn (son of architect Lewis Kahn) conveyed when expressing an abandoned child's discovery of his father's artistry in My Architect: A Son's Journey (2004).
At times, it seems that Pollack means for us to be excited by the fact of Gehry's celebrity itself, as if the film was one of those "in-depth" suck-up articles in Vanity Fair or Rolling Stone. What's up with the strange emphasis on psychologist Milton Wexler, except to show Pollack's curious acceptance of Gehry's participation in those Hollywood phenomena: therapy and divorce?
Irony is particularly vivid when Pollack relates to Gehry on artistic terms. On reviews: "I want to hide under the covers," Gehry says. "I know the feeling very well," Pollack avers. "I know you do," brother Frank reassures.
It gets worse when whory Pollack confesses that he has "made peace with the commercial world by finding a small space where he could make a difference." Except for They Shoot Horses, Don't They? (1969), it's hard to think of a Pollack movie that makes a difference or that could not have been made by just anybody. Horses has a disillusioned '60s signature and stylistic yearning as distinct as Gehry's. Its singular accomplishment is what patron Michael Eisner meant when claiming, "You give Frank the functionality, and he delivers the picture."
Sketches disappoints because Pollack does not deliver the picture of what makes Gehry's architecture notable. When disapproving art critic Hal Foster rejects the hype and says Gehry's buildings "function as spectacle" rather than durable edifices, that shrewd critical perception gets lost because Pollack has failed to make Gehry's structures work as cinematic spectacle.
Sad fact is, despite Pollack's expensive taste in clothes and buildings, he's all wrong for a movie about architecture. Gehry needed a genuine cinema artist like Antonioni or John Boorman, directors who know how to make imposing buildings seem to dance. Or even the music video director Hype Williams who shot Mariah Carey's "Sweetheart" video among the flying wings and metallic curvature of the Bilbao museum and achieved a sense of wonder. For Pollack to pretend that he understands art or the artistic temperament turns the daydreamed drawing-board squiggles revealed in Sketches into nonsense.